<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>DealFatigue - Latest Comments in dil fəˈtig</title><link>http://dealfatigue.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment Law Blog</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:33:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: dil fəˈtig</title><link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/04/28/deal-fatigue/#comment-1554846</link><description>Every so often a lawyer or agent tells me: "When people are this passionate about a project it won't go away." Words of doom. What this means is not that the deal is a shoo in, but that X is not allowing for deal fatigue. X sees no reason why we can't push it through with his boilerplate contract, which is quick and easy, which means no negotiating space is left for the things the client actually cares about.  Terrible. Terrible. Great blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helen DeWitt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: dil fəˈtig</title><link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/04/28/deal-fatigue/#comment-1554845</link><description>I enjoy the way you write. It is informative...you let the reader BE THERE.I always learn something "inside" about a subject that I would have no access to.Keep up the good work.Katie</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">katherine stephens</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:40:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>