<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>DealFatigue - Latest Comments in Grass Roots Licensing Of Youtube Fare</title><link>http://dealfatigue.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment Law Blog</description><atom:link href="https://dealfatigue.disqus.com/grass_roots_licensing_of_youtube_fare/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:24:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Grass Roots Licensing Of Youtube Fare</title><link>http://dealfatigue.com/grass-roots-licensing-of-youtube-fare/#comment-7287221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;II had missed your posts and now I know why...Your ability to take disparate ideas and merge them into a clear productive overview is interesting and instructive. many thanks...keep em coming&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">katherine stephens</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:24:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grass Roots Licensing Of Youtube Fare</title><link>http://dealfatigue.com/grass-roots-licensing-of-youtube-fare/#comment-7286082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might also consider looking at "Homestar Runner" as well since they are quite popular.  They've got t-shirts and DVD versions of their shorts for sale on a website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frankly I don't see a future where the major players (studios, networks, etc) are completely absent or irrelevant.  It will, however, become more common for them to recruit successful interest based entertainers.&lt;br&gt;-Jonathan&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:32:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>