<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>DealFatigue - Latest Comments in WGA Deal (Pretty Much) Closes. Now Let The Healing Begin.</title><link>http://dealfatigue.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment Law Blog</description><atom:link href="https://dealfatigue.disqus.com/wga_deal_pretty_much_closes_now_let_the_healing_begin/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:03:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WGA Deal (Pretty Much) Closes. Now Let The Healing Begin.</title><link>http://dealfatigue.com/wga-deal-pretty-much-closes.-now-let-the-healing-begin./#comment-1554876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the question for me is would the writers have achieved a better deal if they deferred on negotiating a new contract for a year or two?  I think that by then, the industry will have a decent, working, business model for downloading movies and TV shows.  right now, things are too experimental and no one knows what strategy is going to make the best money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;so, if the WGA renewed their old deal for a short term and didn't obligate themselves to any long-term royalty deal for such downloads, I think that they would have been a much better place to get their royalty structure.  It's always easier to discuss a revenue stream that is established versus a theoretical one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steve corn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WGA Deal (Pretty Much) Closes. Now Let The Healing Begin.</title><link>http://dealfatigue.com/wga-deal-pretty-much-closes.-now-let-the-healing-begin./#comment-1554877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;so who won?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joseph</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>